According to The New York Post, the lawsuit was primarily predicated on a statute from the 1800s known as a "pauper's statute," which was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court over 80 years ago in Edwards v. California (1941). The suit, as previously reported by Law Enforcement Today, sought to stop the bussing of the "tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants who have flooded the so-called "sanctuary city." Additionally, it sought to recoup the cost of housing and feeding them from the bus lines.
According to The New York Post, the lawsuit was primarily predicated on a statute from the 1800s known as a "pauper's statute," which was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court over 80 years ago in Edwards v. California (1941). The suit, as previously reported by Law Enforcement Today, sought to stop the bussing of the "tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants who have flooded the so-called "sanctuary city." Additionally, it sought to recoup the cost of housing and feeding them from the bus lines.